1 min read
People Analytics vs HR Analytics: The Evolution
When I first started work with InfoHRM in the people analytics domain back in 2006, we were the only vendor in the space and had been for over a...
Can you articulate the HR metrics and Analytics use and impact your team is having on the business? Calculate the value of people analytics. Read blog now.
Is your organization making better, more data-informed talent decisions today versus a year ago? This is the ultimate test of any people analytics (PA) program, initiative, team, COE, or department. If the answer is yes, the investments in PA continue and expand. If the answer is no, then PA budgets are questioned.
So how can we demonstrate the value of people analytics? In our latest whitepaper, "Measuring the Value of People Analytics," we address this from the ground up, starting with the mission of people analytics and moving into the utilization of the content delivered by the PA team.
With a more comprehensive view of the how PA creates value, you will be better positioned to build your business case for people analytics. Whether you are seeking initial, incremental, or transformational level investments, this value framework will help you to convince your organization to become fully invested in HR analytics.
The proposed ROI calculations that many vendors recommend for people analytics are not very good -- and some are downright laughable. This is one of the reasons I worked on this paper.
Two common approaches:
The promise that PA technology will reduce turnover and putting a financial value on it ... then hiding when the 'Great Resignation' starts or saying 'it would have been worse!' Ugh! This is not honest or helpful. We can do better in declaring the value we propose to generate. This is one of the key points in the paper.
This blog highlights some of the key elements of the whitepaper. You will definitely want to read the whole thing. Click here to get the full version. |
Why are we investing in people analytics? Is the deliverable we are committing to - the “return” on the investment - as simple as a bit of system and process savings and some hypothetical lift to a couple of KPIs?
Mission of People Analytics:
Drive better, faster, talent decisions at all levels of the organization.
We are investing resources in people analytics to drive and accelerate this mission. The value of people analytics should be judged by the quality of talent decisions that are being made across the organization.
We may not be able to get directly at measuring the quality of talent decisions (though we will address that in an upcoming paper), but we can use utilization as a proxy to get started. If our PA deliverables are being utilized, we can logically assume that the users are placing value on them. They are 'voting' for the content. If it was not valuable, they would ignore it.
In the paper, we demonstrate how utilization can be used to calculate value with relative ease across your PA portfolio.
Looking at each 'analytics event' through a process sequence, a "value journey," we will see how critical PA content is in delivering value at scale. To impact talent decisions at all levels of the organization, we need to build a smooth and fast self-service cycle (left side) by focusing on:
"We have data that can help here." The diagram below shows the target picture, where a user, encountering the talent elements of a business challenge thinks "We have data that can help here." This is the critical first step that ideally flows them into a set of high-quality PA products that can deliver the needed insights.
Any business challenge can be divided into talent elements (staffing, skills, productivity, etc) and non-talent elements (market forces, supplier issues, etc). People analytics provides value through products and services that support understanding and solving for the talent elements of the challenge. To impact talent decisions at scale requires PA teams to deliver insight-generating self-service solutions.
Is there a formula we can use to make our PA investments more intentional? If so, how can we determine: where we should focus our efforts? What content or communications efforts are necessary to deliver the outcomes we expect? Another core assumption in people analytics is that your leaders’ time is a scarce and valuable resource. And we will use that assumption to anchor our value measurement approach. We assume that your organization’s leaders:
Download the paper to see the way we have calculated the value of a small PA portfolio based on the value-utilization framework.
Further work is needed to articulate how to measure the change in talent decision quality more directly. We will be tackling that in future content -- so keep an eye out for it!
1 min read
When I first started work with InfoHRM in the people analytics domain back in 2006, we were the only vendor in the space and had been for over a...
Earlier this year i joined one of The Learning Forum's workforce analytics peer groups and i wanted to share my experience in attendence and why i...
[This article is taken from a presentation I delivered as part of a broader session on People Analytics for the Australian Human Resources Institute...